logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.02.06 2019나104769
부당이득금
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s appeal against the instant principal lawsuit, and the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception of the dismissal of the fourth 18 lines as “acting by proxy” among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff and the defendant are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the first instance court is deemed to show evidence Nos. 5 through 9, and evidence Nos. 10 and 11 submitted by the first instance court, and the fact-finding and decision of the first instance court are justifiable, and there are no errors as alleged in the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff and the defendant). The appeal by the plaintiff against the principal lawsuit of this case and the appeal against the principal lawsuit of this case and the counterclaim by the defendant are all dismissed.

arrow