All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and the counterclaim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. Each of the grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff and the Defendant is not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance trial, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance trial is presented to this court, the fact-finding and judgment in the first instance court is recognized as legitimate (the Defendant submitted a preparatory document and a documentary evidence after the closing of argument, but did not resume the pleadings in this case).

With respect to the main lawsuit and counterclaim of this case, this court's reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the second instance court's rejection of a part of the judgment as follows. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. On February 6, 2010, the judgment of the court of first instance in the same part was dismissed on the 7th page “Seoul 2014.”

Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance is subject to the 9th sentence " January 19, 2015" as " January 19, 2005."

No. 7 of the judgment of the first instance, 12 of the 2015, "Around March 2015" shall be applied to "Around March 2005."

No. 7 of the first instance judgment, 15 of the 16th and 16 of the 2016th and 2017 of the 2006, "Between 2006 and 2007" shall be applied.

The judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed on January 19, 2015 as " January 19, 2015" in the 9th and 15th parallels of the judgment of the court of first instance.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance on the principal lawsuit and counterclaim of this case is justifiable. Thus, all appeals against the plaintiff's principal lawsuit and the defendant's counterclaim are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.