logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.07.21 2015고단820
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 10, 200, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim C that "If he/she fails to pay the part payment of the part payment of the apartment in Seoul erroneous Dong within the period, he/she will be paid the part payment of the part payment of the apartment in Seoul. On February 28, 2000, in borrowing KRW 10 million, he/she borrowed the part payment of the part payment of the part payment of the apartment, he/she will pay the interest calculated in five copies because he/she received the part payment of the part payment of the part payment."

However, in fact, the defendant had no means to receive and lend the time limit money, and the defendant had no intention or ability to pay money to the victim even if he has already borrowed money from another person due to a large amount of debt to the other person.

Around February 11, 2000, the Defendant received from the victim a remittance of KRW 10 million in the name of the borrowed money to the bank account in his own name.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Around June 24, 2000, the Defendant: (a) around 36 months from July 15, 2000 to June 15, 2003, made a written agreement of installment financing that the Defendant, at the automobile dealer located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, borrowed KRW 5 million for the purchase of vehicles from the victim installment financing company; and (b) paid the monthly installments in equal installments amounting to KRW 198,790 each month from July 15, 200 to June 15, 2003, and delivered it to the employees in default of the name of the victim company.

However, even if the Defendant was given a loan from the installment financing company, he did not have the intention to purchase the vehicle, and even if he was given a loan from the victim because there had already been no other debt, he did not have the intention or ability to repay the loan.

The Defendant received 5 million won in the name of the victim corporation, i.e., e., the borrowed money, from an employee under the name of the victim corporation.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim corporation.

3. The criminal defendant against the victim E is guilty on or around September 4, 200, Jung-gu Seoul.

arrow