beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On January 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud from the Suwon District Court’s Pyeongtaek District Court on July 30, 2014, and the parole period expired on August 16, 2014.
[Criminal facts] 2018 Highest 715
1. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) purchased a vehicle using installment financing in the name of the Defendant’s name with a bromoer from an influorous loan from an influorous land of Incheon City (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul City”); (b) sold the vehicle without delay; and (c) conspired to create and distribute a “large-scale car” by selling the vehicle, and to have the disposal proceeds divided.
On the same day, the person in whose name is influent will prepare documents necessary for the loan of installment financing of automobiles, and the defendant submitted an application for the debate (automobile installment financing) prepared under the name of the defendant as if he would pay the money properly to the employees of the victim's EF Savings Bank, Inc., Ltd., in the influent area of not more than Incheon City.
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property at the time, and there was no intention or ability to pay installments properly even if the Defendant received installment financing from the victim company, because he did not have any other property at the time, immediately after purchasing the vehicle with the loan from the victim company.
The Defendant, in collusion with the person who was unable to make a statement, by deceiving the victim as above, received 12 million won as a loan for installment financing from the injured party.
2. Around April 2016, the Defendant: (a) told the victim E operated by the victim in Young-gun, Gangwon-do; and (b) stated that “The Defendant would sell 5 mobile phones for 400,000 won to the victim during gallon sales stores.”
However, in fact, the above mobile phone was temporarily lent as owned by the defendant, and only was used, and the defendant has the authority to dispose of it.