logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.09.13 2013고단3205
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. On March 16, 2013, at around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) took alcohol at the E main shop operated by the victim D in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju; (b) demanded other customers to provide alcohol at the main shop; and (c) made some of the customers who had been located there, such as drinking expenses, left the main shop; and (d) obstructed the victim’s main shop business by force.

B. On June 1, 2013, around 03:00, the Defendant: (a) at H’s point operated by the Victim G in Gwangju Mine-gu, the Defendant laid down an unclaimed customer from the table table to the table table; (b) and (c) caused the customer who was at that place to go away from the table table, thereby obstructing the victim’s main store business by force.

C. On July 10, 2013, around 02:30 on July 10, 2013, the Defendant saw that “in the Republic of Korea, there exists a heavy interest, such as “at home, there is a beer to be a beer and beer,” and other customers in the main place have been in dispute with the victim’s G having been able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to able

2. Performance of official duties;

A. At around 03:00 on July 10, 2013, the Defendant refused to comply with the Defendant’s demand from the slopeJ belonging to the G District Unit of the Gwangju Mine Police Station, which the Defendant called out after receiving a report that he frighted, to leave the main place. On the other hand, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant’s right chest part of the Defendant’s right chest part of the saidJ once, by resisting the defect that the Defendant attempted to arrest the offender in the act of interference with business, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

B. The Defendant around 04:40 on July 10, 2013.

arrow