logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.12.04 2014고정953
공용물건손상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:05, at Jeju-si, sent the F patrol police box affiliated with the Jeju-dong Police Station Diplomatic Police Station D, according to the report of the assault case at the C cafeteria operated by the Defendant at the C cafeteria operated by the Defendant at Jeju-si.

The Defendant did not complete the case processing of the patrol vehicle that returns to the police box after finishing the assault case and thought that the patrol vehicle was discarded, and then damaged the patrol vehicle to the right side of the patrol vehicle with the left shoulder.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged public goods equivalent to 50,000 won at the market price of the patrol car used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph and estimate;

1. Relevant provisions of criminal facts: Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. A provisional payment order: A punishment shall be determined as per the disposition in consideration of all the following circumstances as the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: A favorable normal condition shall be determined in light of the following circumstances: (a) recognized a crime; (b) it is difficult to view the degree of damage; (c) taken measures to repair damaged goods; (d) the wife and two children are supported by the wife and two children; (b) a fine of 300,000 won was imposed for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 199 and 2000; and (d) other records of having been punished four times by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) by 2012: The defendant's age, occupation

arrow