2012Nu7167 Revocation of the additional payment of new employment promotion subsidy

A

The Head of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office Seoul Gangnam District Office

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2011Guhap3303 decided February 10, 2012

September 6, 2012

October 11, 2012

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's disposition of site salary for new employment promotion subsidy to the plaintiff on February 16, 2011 shall be revoked.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is that "Presidential Decree No. 22063" is applied to "Presidential Decree No. 22603" in the foreparts 8, 9, 8, and 19 of the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance, and "No. 22603" shall be added to "No. 22603" in the front of the second half of the second half and the second half of the judgment, "No. 82%" in the first half of the fourth half of the judgment shall be deemed to be "no. 27%", and "no. 82%" in the second half of the fourth half of the judgment shall be deemed to be "no. 5%", "no. 8%" in the fourth half of the judgment shall be deemed to be "no. 14%", and "no. 410" shall be deemed to be "labor contract period", and the second half of the judgment shall be cited as "no. 280%" in the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and it is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge and the assistant judge;

Judges Park Jong-tae

Judges Kim Jae-han