1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: Gap's evidence Nos. 13 and 14, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion, and the result of the court's order to submit financial transaction information to the subordinate credit union of this court is rejected; "from August 1, 2015 to August 1, 2015" of the first instance judgment No. 3 shall be "from August 1, 2015"; and " August 3, 2005" of the fourth 11 as " August 13, 2005" of the fourth 4th 11 as "the grounds for the judgment of the first instance," and therefore, it shall be cited as it is stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment except where it is stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.