1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The appeal cost (including the part arising from the supplementary participation) shall be the plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not different from the argument of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance is examined together with the plaintiff's assertion, and the statement of evidence Nos. 20 to 24, which was additionally submitted at the court

Therefore, the reasoning for the instant judgment is as follows: (a) the reasoning for the instant judgment is the same as the ground for the first instance judgment, except where the “from August 3, 2017 to August 2017” of the first instance judgment No. 3 is deemed to be “from September 2017,” and thus, (b) the same is acceptable pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.