1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons why the court of the first instance's explanation on this case is the evidence additionally submitted at the trial, and it is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion that "the defendant's act of violating the duty of prohibition of competitive business caused damage to the plaintiff's point in the actual suspension of business from October 1, 2013 to October 24 of the same month" and the fact-finding on the party close to the corporation of this court, and the fact-finding on the party close to the corporation of this court, the court's reasoning is the same as the reasons of the first instance's judgment, except for the rejection of the result of the order to submit each financial transaction information against the defendant's sexual agricultural cooperatives, new banks, new banks, Arabic-North Korean credit cooperatives, and Indian agricultural cooperatives, as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.