logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.25 2017고합449
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,00,000.

Defendant

C The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that the facts charged and the basic facts are identical and there is no concern about causing substantial disadvantages to the defendants' exercise of their right to defense, specific facts are partially recognized differently from the facts charged.

1. Defendant A [Defendant’s career, etc.], who was attending D University, was working as a G player by running the E-year Fasi Game with a national representative for G items, and then retired from a competition campaign in 2002, and thereafter, sold clothes and the main office operation was conducted since that time. From around 2008, the Defendant, who was establishing and operating a sales company for the long-term, such as the bank of the trade name “I”, was able to store a kind of relationship with J while selling the goods after receiving an order from J around 2012.

The Defendant: (a) around the beginning of the year of 2013, K K president possessed a bank sold to J and came to know of the private friendship of J and the President; (b) around the mid-2013, the Defendant had a separate work room in Gangnam-gu Seoul L, which was employed by a designer, foundation, etc., and produced the president’s parliamentary and provisional work room.

On April 5, 2014 to around 5, 2014, the Defendant received a request from the J to “a request to find and inform a reasonable person who can plan and produce various promotional materials to improve national brand,” and introduced the video release, including advertising, through a person who wants to do so, to J upon introduction of M.

The Defendant was aware that there was a de facto pro rata relationship with the President, as a member of the National Committee under direct control of the President, and that there was a de facto pro rata relationship with the President, such as appointment of P as the President Secretary of Q, and appointment of S, the external third village of R M as the President Secretary of T of the Office of the President of the Republic of Korea.

On the other hand, around the beginning of the year of 2014, the Defendant leased the Seoul Gangnam-gu U.S. U. office under his own name under the direction of J, and the J was from time to time, and obtained official documents from Cheongdae et al.

arrow