Of the acquittal portion of the judgment of the court below, the violation of the Political Funds Act relating to the sequence 21 of the crime sight table and the judgment of the court below.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

1) Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery 1): The defendant was given a flexible delivery of 100 million won as well as 50,000 won to the prosecutor's appeal on the amount of emulation that the defendant received from both parties.

B) The Defendant’s grounds of appeal on whether the money and valuables received by the Defendant constitute a bribe is not money and valuables in return for the resolution of civil complaints related to G institutions, but only paid support money by intimidation of M intended to raise support payments. In addition, even if M demands money and valuables to J in return for the settlement of civil complaints, the Defendant was paid as political funds from J without contact with M and will. In addition, the Defendant was recognized as having resolved a legitimate civil petition, i.e., the south of J on May 10, 2015, and that the Defendant was paid for more than four months. In light of these circumstances, the Defendant merely thought that it was political support and did not receive support money from 200 days prior to the delivery of it, and there was no awareness that it was no money and valuables from 20 days prior to the delivery of it.

Even if he requested the subcontract to the Corporation and the defendant made a statement that he would help solve civil petitions, it is a solicitation that the defendant made the relevant call to the head of the H Agency W after the lapse of one year and four months from that later, at the time of receiving KRW 20 million.