(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.07.17 2019고단948

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.07.17 2019고단948

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 18, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 03:50 on March 18, 2019, at the D convenience point where the victim C (the age of 33) in the Sungsi-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si (the age of 33) works, and tried to make a phone call with a mobile phone stringer, and (b) he must dispose of the things “ from the victim”; (c) he must do so; (d) the president, “the victim, who is hinger, and hinged, and hings the victim, upon reporting to the police, hing the victim,” and (d) the police officers who received the report after the call but continued to do so, and (d) the police officers could not file a complaint at any time; and (e) the Defendant did not have to enter the convenience point, such as “the victim,” and “the victim may not file a complaint with the victim.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the convenience store business of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the report on occurrence (Interference with business), the 112 report processing table, the report on dispatch (on-site exit details, etc.), the closure photographs, and CCTV image-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) does not mean that the defendant, on the ground of sentencing of the provisional payment order, does not mean that the degree of interference with the victim's business, and in particular, even in the situation where the police officer called out, his duty

The defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes, and the defendant has committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment.

However, the Defendant recognized the crime of this case and its liability.

The age, character and conduct of the defendant, and the details and circumstances of the crime of this case.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.11.06 2019고단1336

-인천지방법원 2021.04.15 2020고단9445

-대구지방법원 2016.05.04 2016고정527

-창원지방법원 2014.04.15 2014고정114

-울산지방법원 2016.11.16 2016고단3691