1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. The defendant’s argument that the court is new in this court is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of the first instance, except for the additional decision under Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, the court’s explanation concerning this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the

From 2 up to 10 lines shall be as follows:

A. The Plaintiff Co., Ltd.: (a) January 16, 2017; and (b) January 17, 2017, Plaintiff Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant application site”); and (c) January 17, 2017, respectively, the Defendant C and D (hereinafter “instant application site”).

A) On the other hand, the facility capacity is 996kW, the preparatory period for the business is 36 months from the date of permission, and the permission for the electric generation business for solar power generation for solar power generation under the individual laws was granted on the condition that the authorization and permission should be granted in accordance with the individual laws. 3rd page of the “National Land Planning and Utilization Act” is regarded as “National Land Planning and Utilization Act (hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”).

3 4. The following shall be added to 4.00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :00 :

4 The location and location of the 4th line shall be changed to “one location.”

4. The 4th line is “only as it is” and “only as it is.”

4 The following shall be added to four lines:

The Defendant asserts that if solar power infrastructure is installed in the instant application site, it would hinder the distribution crisis of the Park Cemetery located in the vicinity of the said site, but does not submit objective evidence to recognize it. 4.13 per cent following the addition of the following:

Although the Defendant asserts that if solar power generation facilities are installed in the instant application site, landslides, etc. may occur, it is difficult to recognize that a landslide may occur in the vicinity of the instant application site due to solar power generation facilities to be installed in the future only with each description of newspaper article (No. 9-1, 2) submitted by the Defendant (No. 9-1, 2).