1. As to KRW 540,221,168 and KRW 299,148,042 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 540,221,168, and KRW 223,443,617.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The plaintiff is the A apartment in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case").

(2) The Defendant, as the project undertaker of the instant apartment construction project (hereinafter “instant construction project”), constructed the instant apartment and sold 7 and 336 households of the 696 household units among the 1196 household units (hereinafter “the instant apartment units”) (or 4 and 360 household units are leased households; hereinafter “the instant lease household”) and the Defendant’s new public corporation (hereinafter “the Defendant’s new public corporation for the Defendant”) is the contractor of the instant apartment units. The Defendant, as the Defendant, as the project undertaker of the instant new construction project (hereinafter “instant construction project”), is the Defendant’s new construction project of the instant apartment units, and the Defendant, as the Defendant, as the co-contractor company for the Defendant, and the Hyundai elevator company, as a subcontractor for the instant construction project from the Defendant’s new public corporation for the Defendant’s participation in the Defendant.

B. The Defendant had undergone a pre-use inspection on November 20, 2009 on the instant apartment. 2) The Defendant did not construct the part to be built in the instant construction work, or revised the design drawing differently from the design drawing.

Therefore, the plaintiff had been continuously requested to repair defects from March 8, 2010 to the defendant at the request of the tenant and the sectional owner of the apartment of this case. However, there are any defects such as the specification of the item of defects in the apartment of this case (attached Form). In order to repair the apartment of this case, it is required to cover the same amount of expenses as indicated below on the premise that "part design" is "after the crack of the outer wall," under the premise that the repair of the apartment of this case is "part design" (the result was reflected in the case where the appraiser corrected any error or changed his opinion through the result of each correction of appraisal, and the cost of defect repair was calculated).The second second year of the changed construction after the inspection of the use before the classification was conducted.