1. The Defendant’s KRW 464,310,049 among the Plaintiff and KRW 101,00,000 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 363,310,049.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a self-governing organization comprised of 553 households (230 units in lots, 323 units in lots) located in A apartment in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

The defendant is a company that constructed and sold the apartment of this case.

B. The Defendant had undergone a pre-use inspection on March 11, 2009 with respect to the instant apartment. 2) On the instant apartment, there were many defects, such as cracks and water leakages, etc., in the common areas and exclusive areas of the instant apartment, by failing to construct the parts to be constructed in accordance with the design drawings, or by performing erroneous construction or defective construction.

Accordingly, the plaintiff continued to request the defendant to repair the defects at the request of the sectional owners or occupants of the apartment of this case, and the defendant completed the defect repair through the construction company, etc., but the defendant did not pay the repair properly.

1. to 1.

3. There still remains the same defects as indicated in the summary table for each defect list, and in order to repair them, the following expenses are required on the premise that “part design” after rupture repair of the outer wall (However, the defect repair cost is calculated on the basis of the amount calculated on the whole of 230 households of the apartment of this case, among the apartment of this case, the defect repair cost is calculated on the basis of the amount calculated on the basis of the defect repair cost on the whole of the 230 households of the apartment of this case, and the appraiser corrected or changed his opinion through each appraisal supplementary entrustment, the defect repair cost was calculated on the basis of the outcome. Attached Form 1 is the aggregate table by the defect list of the five units of the apartment of this case among the apartment of this case, and Attached Table 2 is the aggregate table by the defect list of the section for common use that is not divided into the apartment of this case, and the cost of the section for common use indicated in the table below is the sum of attached Tables 1