logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.04.11 2012고단6194
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A and C were de facto marital relations.

The Defendant, as a result of the need for funds for directors, attempted to obtain a loan as security for the land owned by the Gyeonggi-gun Group D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) of the Gyeonggi-gun D (hereinafter referred to as “D”), but was aware of the fact that the loan was not exceeded KRW 25 million, he renounced the loan, and thought the Defendant’s double-type victims E, who were the Defendant’s double-type victims, would have sold the said D land by pretending that there was a person who lives rapidly at the low price.

Therefore, the Defendant, around January 25, 2012, tried to purchase this land from the victim’s 75 million won from the seeds house located in the vicinity of the past, at the same time. This land can be sold at the house between the seeds on the face of two pages and the profits of KRW 20 million may be earned. The Defendant said that “the land inside and outside of the flobs shall be cut off.”

However, the above seeds did not intend to purchase the above land at all, and the defendant did not sell this land within two months and did not have the ability or intent to make the victim raise the profit of KRW 20 million.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 50 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) of C on January 26, 2012, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statement to the effect that the defendant sells the D land owned C to the victim on the date and time set in this court, and that he/she has received KRW 50 million from the victim as the purchase price;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. The witness C had been aware that, at least 1 and 2 years prior to the instant case, C had an intention to look at the land by leaving the land by telephone at the time of this case, the witness C knew that he did not have an intention to look at the land by hearing the answer from the principal.

arrow