The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On June 23, 2018, the Defendant collected 133,000 won of trees at the market price in the 12nd floor of the Goyang-gu Police Station, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, the 12nd floor of the Kanyang Police Station, in relation to the case being investigated after being received in the Goyang-gu cyber team of the Goyangyang Police Station, and caused the disturbance. However, the Defendant collected 13,00 won of trees at the market price in the above 133,00 won.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. B written statements;

1. Investigation report (Confirmation ofCCTV video recording);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 360 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement [the crime of this case is a damage to the articles used by public offices, and the case is not easy.

However, the Defendant, who had no record of criminal punishment, is a primary offender with no record of causing criminal punishment; it is against the Defendant’s wrong recognition of the damage to public goods; the degree of damage to public goods is relatively minor; the Defendant was suffering from considerable mental pain in the course of investigating a charge of violation of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) due to a lack of evidence; and there are other circumstances to take into account the circumstances leading up to the instant crime as contingent in the course of resisting the investigation; and all sentencing factors specified in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc.)