logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.04.26 2016고단79
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 79"

1. The same year from January 2014, a defendant who violates the Act on Specialized in Credit Financial Business;

2. That the fact that his wife B was denied during the middle police officer to his wife C shall be used for the settlement of accounts at the end of the year, even though it was intended to use it as living expenses, etc.

It received four credit cards in a false manner.

The defendant, while holding a credit card by deceiving C as above, was in possession of the credit card that was delivered to C, was put in a cash automatic payment machine at the victim (state) who was in the situation of B-do in B-do in order to the end of January 2014, and then withdrawn KRW 500,000 by cash services from around that time.

5. From December, 12, the credit card acquired by deceiving C by withdrawing the total amount of KRW 13,048,473 in total over 26 times, such as the list of offenses (1) as shown in attached Table 26.

2. On January 4, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit Business: (a) purchased goods from distribution via a single-use market located in the Yasan-si, Yasan-si (hereinafter referred to as the “Yasan-si”); (b) and (c) deceiving an influent owner of the damaged person as if he had a legitimate authority to use the credit card by presenting C’s national card; and (c) from around that time, the Defendant paid 30,000 won by deceiving

8. Until April 8, 200, the credit card acquired by deceiving C by settling a total of KRW 27,324,827 over a total of 760 times, such as the attached list of crimes (2).

3. Fraud;

A. On December 18, 2013, the Defendant was aware, in advance, of the victim’s non-existence of the name of the person in charge of the loan, who called for the victim’s non-life insurance (state) and called for the loan to the victim’s (state) non-performance of the non-performance of the non-performance of the loan in the influencies city and in the

C The term “C” refers to the personal information of the victim and makes it a false statement as “C”, and the member is from the victim company to the account of the former bank account in the name of “C” 5,980.

arrow