logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.04.13 2018고단118
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 118"

1. From December 18, 2017 to January 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by taking off one of the cases equivalent to KRW 26,000, the market price of the victim’s possession, which was delivered at the same time, in front of the victim D’s house located in Yasan-si; and (b) on December 18, 2017, the Defendant stolen the victims’ property worth KRW 2,887,000, total market price from December 18, 2017 to January 31, 2018.

2. On February 2, 2018, the Defendant attempted to larceny at the front parking lot of 112, 7-8Ra, a pair of apartments 357 on February 2, 2018, in order to hold a door of a car owned by the victim E and to steal money and valuables in that place, the Defendant failed to commit an attempted crime, even though the Defendant was on the top hand of the knife of the above vehicle, but failed to carry the knife the knife on the knife of the vehicle.

3. Violation of Acts in financial business specializing in fraud and credit;

A. On December 18, 2017, the Defendant, at around December 23:27, 2017, obtained property by deceiving the victim and using a stolen credit card by having the employees of the above convenience store pay for the same amount of goods by purchasing one cigarette of KRW 45,000 in the market price as the legitimate holder of the first card that was stolen under the name of “H”, such as the No. 1 No. 23 of the List of Offenses 1, in the following cases: (a) around December 18, 2017; and (b) around December 23:27, 201, the Defendant used the stolen credit card.

2) On December 18, 2017, from around 23:31 to December 00:09, the Defendant, as a lawful holder of the cards stolen under the name of the first holder, such as the No. 1 No. 2 of the crime sight table 1, conducted as if he/she would normally pay alcoholic beverages. The Defendant ordered two times alcoholic beverages worth KRW 180,000 in total, and had an employee of the said main holder pay alcoholic beverages equivalent to the same amount.

arrow