Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) did not commit an indecent act by force against the victim by his hand within the subway, and even if the Defendant’s grandchildren contacted the victim’s body, the Defendant did not commit indecent act by force against the Defendant on the ground that there were many passengers in the subway at the time, and the body of the people around the boom boom and the body of the people around the boom boom.
2. Determination
A. Comprehensively taking account of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court determined that the Defendant committed an indecent act against the Defendant at around 07:35 on April 16, 2014, in the 1st subway station that the Defendant toward the Dowing Station in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, toward the Dowing Station from the Dowing Station, the hand floor was limited to “bbb” and the hand floor was changed to “B” and the Defendant was also deemed to have committed an indecent act.
1) At the investigative agency and the court below, the victim stated consistently and specifically as to the facts of damage at the time of "the victim booming booming with passengers in the front of the victim's left part" and the defendant's behavior at the time of "the victim booming with the victim's booming situation at the time of the time," but the defendant was thought to be prone, not by hand, by contact with the victim's left part, and at the time of leaving the part, she was aware of the booming." In addition, the victim stated that "the defendant was booming with the victim in the state of booming with the victim in the state of "booming with the victim" and the defendant's behavior. 2) If there were many people who were placed the defendant in the front of the 7th line mountain station platform, the victim considered the defendant at the time of leaving the front of the victim's right side, and there was a confusion between the victim and the defendant in the front of the victim."