logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 03. 29. 선고 2017두73938 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 세금계산서가 사실과 다른 세금계산서인지 여부[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu60347 ( November 17, 2017)

Title

(A) Whether the tax invoice of this case is false

Summary

(1) The instant disposition is lawful, inasmuch as it is difficult to view that there exists an actual act of supplying services corresponding to the entry of the instant tax invoice, and thus, it is deemed that the instant tax invoice is a false tax invoice received without actual transactions.

Related statutes

Article 32 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2017Du73938 Disposition of revocation of Value-Added Tax Imposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

○ Iron Co., Ltd.

Defendant-Appellee

○○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2017Nu60347 Decided November 17, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

March 29, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against each appellant.

Reasons

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below, the appellant’s ground of appeal is not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or is deemed to fall under each subparagraph of Article 4(3). Thus, all appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow