logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.05.20 2014고정88
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding seven hundred thousand won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant’s bulletin board “B”, which is a website on which a large number of unspecified Internet users can display a notice;

1. On August 9, 2013: (a) around 23:27, 2013, a letter stating the victim D (years 21) using the victim’s “C” and the word “I C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C B, respectively;

2. On August 12, 2013, on the 22:27th day of August 2013, 2013, notice of “E” and “E”;

3. On August 12, 2013, around 23:18, 2013, a notice on the screen by cutting down the contents of the Kakakao Kakao Kakao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao Kao

4. On August 12, 2013, at around 23:26, 2013, publish a letter “C T Both-year Security Unions” to criticize victims D using the “C” as the clinic;

5. On August 13, 2013, around 15:05, up to a size of 15:05, a summary stating “G” used at the Fermanian website with the content of the Kakakakao A’s Kakao A’s conversation, which refers to the victim D, in which a photograph and A’s photograph are written, and “after and after a single day, women who live in the front and rear side shall be considered only once every three days,” thereby openly insulting the victim as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the closure data after gymoids;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine (if the article that the victim raised leads to the defendant, the suspension of sentence is also examined, but it is not so. Although there are circumstances such as the fact that the defendant was the first offender, the confession of the crime, and reflects on the fact that the degree of insult is serious, it is inappropriate to reduce the amount in consideration of not only the degree of insult but also the fact that there is apprehensions about the victim by considering the personal information of the victim)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;

arrow