1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 27, 2013, the court of Changwon District Court: (a) filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on two occasions against the Plaintiff; (b) filed a motion for exclusion of disturbance and a claim for transfer of land; (c) filed a complaint against the Plaintiff for a charge of general traffic obstruction; and (d) destroyed the Plaintiff’s wall and fence. As a result, the Plaintiff destroyed the Plaintiff’s wall and fence. ① The sum of the daily income and rounddown cost incurred by the attendance of the court and the police station as well as the daily income generated from the non-living of the Plaintiff; (d) KRW 16,389,00 [the sum of the KRW 16,389,00 [the amount of KRW 7,20,000 (the actual income caused by the attendance of the court) and KRW 375,00,000 (the transportation cost caused by the attendance of the court) and KRW 174,000 (the transportation cost caused by the attendance of the Joint Police Station)], KRW 1700,00,000 (the Plaintiff’s wall and damages caused by the Defendant’s complaint.

Therefore, the Plaintiff appealed, but was dismissed (Seoul District Court 2014Na30487), and the Plaintiff’s final appeal was dismissed (Supreme Court 2014Da230917) (Supreme Court 2014Da230917).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant prior suit”). B.

On March 19, 2018, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit.

[Ground for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff's assertion is proceeding with the plaintiff's application for provisional disposition of removal of disturbance and claim for transfer of land against the plaintiff two times, the plaintiff's complaint is suspected of ordinary traffic obstruction, and the plaintiff was punished by having the village people give false testimony, and the plaintiff's wall and steel gate are written.