1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion has been filed against the plaintiff two times in the application for provisional disposition of exclusion of disturbance and claim for delivery of land, and the plaintiff was subject to criminal punishment on suspicion of ordinary traffic obstruction, and the plaintiff's wall and steel gate were destroyed. As a result, ① the plaintiff destroyed the plaintiff's wall and steel gate, ① the sum of the lost income and round-down expenses incurred by the plaintiff who was unable to engage in his/her occupation due to his/her occupation due to the attendance of the court and the police station (=7,200,000 won (the lost income due to the attendance of the court) 8,640,000 won (the cost of transportation due to the attendance of the court) 375,00 won (the cost of transportation due to the attendance of the court) 174,000 won (the cost of transportation due to the attendance of the Changwon District Court), ② the plaintiff's family members who suffered damages due to the defendant's false complaint 1,400,000 won and damages due to the defendant's wall's lawsuit and appeal 10000

2. The plaintiff's above assertion appears to the purport of seeking compensation for damages caused by tort. However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant was intentional or negligent in filing an application for provisional disposition, filing a lawsuit, or filing a complaint against the plaintiff, and that the defendant destroyed the plaintiff's wall and steel gate. The defendant's tort is not recognized since there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit without further review as to the remaining part of the claim.

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.