beta
Text
1. The following parts of the instant lawsuit shall be dismissed:
1 38,439.20
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the Plaintiff’s claim for damages as to whether the Appointor B suffered injuries by shocking the Defendant’s taxi vehicles that joined the mutual-aid projects among the taxi vehicles located in front of the Southern-gu Standing District Office, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter “instant accident”) around June 14:20, 1996 (hereinafter “instant accident”). The specific amount of damages claim is as follows.
B1) In the case of passive damages (actual income) KRW 3,977,00, traffic expenses of KRW 380,00, and in the case of future treatment expenses of KRW 148,854,881 (in the case of preliminary treatment amounting to KRW 8,339,00 (in the case of preliminary treatment amounting to KRW 3,429,00), KRW 3,429,00 (in the case of preliminary treatment amounting to KRW 9,613,00), and KRW 127,473,81 in the case of mental department)
B. The consolation money of KRW 400,000, 100, 100, 1000, i.e., consolation money of KRW 400,000, i.e.
C. Damages for delay stated in the purport of the claim against each of the above amounts
2. As a result of the Plaintiff’s claim for damages relating to the instant accident, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for damages at this court several times on the grounds of the instant accident (hereinafter “transfer lawsuit”). The result of the judgment is as follows, which is either no dispute between the parties or is significant in this court.
In this Court Decision 98Gadan159, 99Na2931, the amount of damages claimed by the Plaintiff was KRW 38,439,897 among the damages claimed by the Plaintiff, KRW 2,675,954, and KRW 9,263,041, 476,070, 43,000, 1,500, 1,500, and 1,500,000, 38, E, 750,000, and 2,675,954 among the damages claimed by the Plaintiff, and the remainder of the claims, including transportation expenses, were dismissed.
On the other hand, the plaintiff did not express that it is a partial claim in the lawsuit in the above judgment, and the above judgment became final and conclusive as it is
B. In the lawsuit of this Court Decision 2012Kadan179, the Plaintiff is in addition to the amount of the existing claim.