1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The plaintiff's assertion in the judgment of the court of first instance is a legislative assertion to the effect that the content of the plaintiff's assertion in the court of first instance is identical to that of the court of first instance or that there is a duty to maintain and develop the bedclothes system for the people's health, or that "an oriental doctor's act of conducting bedclothes treatment" irrelevant to the plaintiff's claim is a violation of the Medical Service Act. The reasons for this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for using partial contents as stated below, and therefore, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Article 7-9 of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.

With respect to this case, the Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 14 stated in the opinion that it is necessary to introduce a quality certification system to a qualification examination institution such as ISO quality certification under the Framework Act on Qualifications in order to support the improvement of public confidence of civil qualification examination institutions, it is merely a request for a survey and cooperation, including the opinion that it is necessary to introduce a quality certification system for the qualification examination institution, such as ISO quality certification, compared to the limited qualification certification system under the Framework Act on Qualifications. The evidence No. 7 is merely a quality management system certification system certificate for the ASEAN Medical Standard Institute under the name of the President of the International Institute for Humanization of Korea, and it is difficult to view that the items stated in the evidence No. 7 and No. 14 are merely a quality management system certificate for the ASEAN Medical Institute under the name of the President of the International Institute for Humanization of Korea, and it is difficult to view that the government institution has expressed the public opinion that it is able to conduct medical care for the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the plaintiff's request should be dismissed.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as there is no reason.