logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.18 2016나2050748
중개수수료지급청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following parts being cited or added. Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or added parts] No. 10 of the 4th page 4 " alone with the evidence submitted by the plaintiff" means "each part of the evidence No. 6, 7, and 8 of the A".

A. At the end of 5th page 4, the Plaintiff asserted that he agreed to pay brokerage fees by expressing the intention to pay brokerage fees to C again on December 28, 2014, but it is difficult to believe that C gave advice to F as described in subparagraph 4-1, 7, and 8, and that it is difficult to recognize it as an act mediating the instant sales contract between F and the Defendant. In addition, Article 5-7 (3) is added. On the other hand, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant and H agreed to pay brokerage fees by expressing the intention to pay brokerage fees to F on the same page, but, on the other hand, the statement in subparagraph 6 is difficult to believe that it is not sufficient to acknowledge it solely on the basis of the statement in subparagraphs 4-1, 6, and 7, and 8, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it differently. Thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow