1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows 2. The plaintiffs' argument in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment of the court of first instance as to the plaintiffs' argument in the judgment of the court of first instance 3. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

2. From 17th through 17th of the first instance judgment of the first instance court: “The only descriptions of evidence No. 7 to 11, and 15th of the first instance judgment shall be written” with “The only descriptions of evidence No. 7 to 11, and 15th of the first instance judgment and the testimony of AO of the concerned witness”.

Nos. 16 through 17 of the first instance judgment: "No. 8 and 13 of the A" shall be written with "No. 8, 13, 21 through 25, 38, 39 of the A".

Nos. 25, 13 through 15 of the judgment of the first instance court: “The above plaintiffs received the file of this case from AF without verifying the authenticity thereof,” and “The above plaintiffs received the file of this case published anonymously by AF and without verifying the authenticity thereof.”

3. Additional determination

A. As to the Plaintiff A et al.’s assertion of additional administrative necessity, the Plaintiff et al. (A) et al.: ① Defendant U, the management owner of the Defendant Company AB Group’s AB Group’s affiliated company, and his mother, were indicted for the charge of embezzlement and embezzlement, and sentenced to each punishment, the accounting book was operated in the course of the crime; the Defendant Company was punished by a fine for negligence in violation of the Disclosure Regulations on Large-Scale Internal Transactions; ② according to the Defendant Company’s management management evaluation statement as of the end of 48 period (from April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005) prepared by the certified public accountant Q Q as of the end of the period of 48 years (from March 1, 2004), the decrease of net income at the time is due to the increase of non-ordinary operating expenses. In comparison with the average business type, the issue is the increase of Defendant Company’s non-permanent assets and the degree