1. On July 10, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition of the suspension of business of 105 days (from July 20, 2015 to November 2, 2015) against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 11, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into an international marriage brokerage agreement with A, stating that “the Plaintiff shall provide various services for international marriage, such as arranging friendship or women as the other party to marriage brokerage,” and that “A shall pay KRW 35 million (i.e., aviation charges, local stay expenses, contact expenses, local marriage awareness expenses, and expenses for local marriage, 31.5 million won for marriage brokerage).”

(hereinafter “instant marriage brokerage contract”. On the same day, the Plaintiff and A agreed to recognize that “A” is prohibited from providing personal information of the other woman before the Plaintiff is placed on the same day, and that “A shall be provided with official documents, unmarried certificates, health certificates, criminal records certificates, etc. of the women finally determined on the premise of marriage after reporting the opposite line based on the personal protocol provided by the Plaintiff, and upon receiving a written public document, unmarried certificate, medical examination certificate, and criminal record certificate, and A shall not raise any objection against the violation of the Marriage Brokerage Business Act due to the non-provision of personal information before the next day

(hereinafter “instant special agreement”). B.

A, unlike the instant marriage brokerage contract, entered the Republic of Korea with KIKOStan and introduced 10 KIKOStan women. The Plaintiff did not provide A with the personal information of the said women certified by a notary public of KIKOStan in writing.

C. On July 10, 2015, the Defendant did not provide user A with computerized personal information (amended by Act No. 13177, Feb. 3, 2015; hereinafter “Marriage Brokers Business Act”).

Article 10-2 (1), hereinafter referred to as "grounds for Disposition 1".

(2) Even though the content of the contract was modified by mediating the international marriage of the user A and the KIKO women, the user A did not prepare a written contract with the user A for any modified matter.

Not more than the violation of Article 10 (1) 2 of the Marriage Brokerage Business Act.