1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,832,00 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from April 3, 2015 to October 7, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public announcement 1) B project approval and public announcement 2) project approval C on November 27, 2013; D public notification D on December 26, 2013; E on October 21, 2014; and 3 project operator of the same public notification F3: Defendant

B. Each land listed in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “each land of this case”) of the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on February 16, 2015 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”) as indicated in the attached Table 1 of the subject of expropriation compensation (hereinafter “each land of this case”).

[Attachment 2] Each of the obstacles listed in Schedule 2 on each of the above lands (hereinafter “each of the obstacles of this case,” and “all of the trees excluding the main parts of this case,” refers to each of the corresponding trees.

2) Each of the instant lands: 21,186,00 won for each of the instant obstacles: 300,000 won for each of the instant obstacles: 20,000 won for each of the instant items; the starting date of expropriation: 20,886,000 won for each of the instant items: 4 April 24, 2015: An appraisal corporation: a national appraisal corporation, a stock company, a stock company, and a stock company, a stock company (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal”) (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication”) for each of the instant obstacles: the results of appraisal; hereinafter referred to as “appraisal”).

C. Each of the instant lands of this Court: KRW 204,120,000 (the result of the commission of the appraiser G of this Court to the appraiser G of this Court; KRW 204,120,000 (the result of the commission of the appraiser G of this Court; hereinafter referred to as the “first court appraiser”); and the result of the appraisal is “the first court appraisal”.

(2) Each item of this case: KRW 262,527,00 (the result of the commission of appraisal to the Korea Landscaping Office, a stock company, hereinafter referred to as "the second court appraiser," and the result of such appraisal is referred to as "the second court appraiser"): Since the object of appraisal has already been lost at the time of the first court appraisal, the Plaintiff requested the Korea Landscaping Association to make an appraisal on June 25, 2013, and based on the size, quantity, etc. of each item of this case stated in the appraisal statement sent by the said Association on June 25, 2013.