1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 50,943,384 won and the period from May 20, 2015 to August 29, 2017.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

A. Business name - Business name: Free economic zone development project (B) (hereinafter “instant project”): Public notice: C/Project name announced by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy on September 3, 2013 - Project operator: Defendants

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on March 26, 2015 - The date of expropriation: May 19, 2015: - obstacles owned by the Plaintiff on the ground of Pyeongtaek-si D, located in the instant project area, business facilities, and trees 29,915 (hereinafter “instant trees”): Compensation: KRW 330,387,120 (for compensation for trees of this case among them, KRW 51,725,00): An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation on the date of Jung-si appraisal corporation, one appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisals”), one appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisals”), and the result of appraisal of the appraisal (hereinafter “the result of appraisal of expropriation”).

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection by December 17, 2015 - Dismissal of an objection by the Central Land Tribunal - An appraisal corporation: An ordinary appraisal corporation and an appraisal corporation on December 1, 201

D. Results of entrustment of appraisal to appraiser E for a case of preservation of evidence (hereinafter referred to as “examiner for preservation of evidence”; hereinafter referred to as “the result of appraisal of evidence”) in Suwon District Court Hyeongwon 2015Kaga1020 - Compensation for trees of this case: KRW 102,668,384 (specific details are as shown in attached Table 1)

E. As a result of the appraiser F’s appraisal (hereinafter “appraisal”) - The appraiser F’s appraisal result is “court appraiser”, and the appraisal result is “court appraisal result” - The appraiser F’s appraisal result is assessed as to the receipt, specification, and seedling ordinarily available for commercialization or sale as to each of the trees listed in the table “Class B” in the instant trees (hereinafter “instant trees”) (specific details are as indicated in the table in the table in the table in attached Table 2) / there is no dispute as to whether there is evidence Nos. 1, 2-2, 3, 4-2, 4-2, 6, 7-1 through 11, 8, 2-1, 2-4, 2-1 through 4, 2-2, and 3-4, and the appraisal result of appraiser F, and the appraisal result of this court’s stock company.