logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.04 2013구합5105
보상금증액
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 37,348,00 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 3,125,00 for Plaintiff B; and (c) for each of them, from December 13, 2012 to June 1, 2015.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) ADD ( May 30, 2008), and E ( January 3, 2012) published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (hereinafter “instant project”) - Project operator: Defendant

B. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on October 19, 2012 - The target of expropriation: the relevant trees in attached Form 1 stating the details of the compensation for trees (hereinafter “instant trees”) owned by the Plaintiffs on the ground of Pyeongtaek-si F

- Plaintiff A: 193,812,40 won for compensation for losses on December 12, 2012 - Plaintiff B: 27,855,540 won ( trees 21,85,5400 won and other obstacles 6,812,400 won for other obstacles): 27,855,540 won for compensation for losses on December 12, 2012

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on May 23, 2013 – The Plaintiff A: 213,741,400 won for compensation (the amount of KRW 206,80,000 for losses and other obstacles 6,941,400 for trees) : Plaintiff B: 30,474,600 won (the amount of KRW 23,70,000 for trees and other obstacles 6,774,600 for other obstacles): - The appraisal business entity: A new appraisal corporation, a new appraisal corporation, a stock company (hereinafter collectively referred to as “appraisal”; the results of the appraisal is referred to as “appraisal”): The appraisal criteria: The appraisal is difficult or remarkably difficult for the transfer cost calculated by comprehensively taking into account the species, size, quantity of trees, the area of trees, profitability, possibility of transplantation, difficulty of transplantation, and other factors of transplantation, and the transfer cost of the relevant trees exceeds the acquisition cost of the relevant trees.

As a result of the Court’s entrustment of appraisal to the appraiser G (hereinafter “court appraiser”) of this Court, the appraisal result of this case’s appraisal result 1) on February 4, 2014: The appraisal standard for the appraisal report by the appraisal panel on February 4, 2014: the type, size, receipt, quantity, food area, management condition, profitability, etc. of the case.

arrow