logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2021.03.24 2021고단123
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on September 23, 202 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 28, 2020.

1. On August 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 22, 2019, lent money to the victim B from the Kakao Stockholm to the Defendant; (b) on August 22, 2019, it is necessary to cash.

N. N. L. L. A. L. a. card company with a card loan of KRW 10,000,000,000, not with interest paid to the card company 100,000,000,000.

“.....”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have worked in the lending company at the time or run the lending business and did not have any other income, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not think that it would be used as the Defendant’s personal debt, gambling fund, living expenses, etc., and did not have any intent or ability to change it to the victim even if he borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 10 million to the post office account (C) of the Defendant on the same day from the victim.

2. On August 28, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around August 28, 2019, on the street in front of the Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Office Office Office Office Office Officetel (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office Office) (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office Office”) around the day on which August 28, 2019: (b) the Defendant obtained monthly income from KRW 900,000 per month if he/she received monthly income from the company in charge of the deposit money; and (c) the Defendant would return the principal when he/she wishes to do so.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the damaged person on the same ground as the statement in Paragraph 1, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to change it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 53 million to the above post office account of the Defendant on the same day from the victim.

In this respect.

arrow