Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On June 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 29, 2014.
[2014 Highest 3640] The Defendant said that the Defendant was North Korean defectors, on December 30, 2013, the C Apartment 201 Dong 2002, and the victim D (the age of 43) lent money to the victim as to whether it is necessary to escape from North Korea’s family. When lending money, the Defendant would make repayment by April 30, 2014.
However, the defendant had no particular property at the time, and even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, he/she had no intention or ability to repay the money in accordance with the promise.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 80,000 United Nations (Korean), from the victim, 80,000 won, and transferred 1.5 million won on January 27, 2014 to his/her post office account and acquired 9,50,000 won by deception.
[2014 Highest 4554] On May 2012, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would have to have the deposit money from the victim F, who was the victim F, which was the victim F, which was the victim EM 202, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, sought from the victim the deposit money to the Man-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu
However, in fact, the tenant of the above G apartment was not the defendant, but the defendant was a friendship with the defendant, and the defendant did not have any property or a certain amount of hospitalization, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victim to use it for personal debt repayment and living expenses.
around May 21, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 16 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of borrowing money.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
Summary of Evidence
[2014 Highest 3640]
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The police of D. D.