beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 27, 2012, around July 27, 2012, the fraud Defendant stated that “D” working for the Defendant on the eightth floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Cbuilding, and “on the part of the victim E, who is a workplace partner, would have to repay the money to him/her if he/she lends the money to him/her for business purposes.”
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he was thought to use it for his personal purpose, and there was no intention or ability to pay it.
Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, was urged by the victim to receive three million won from the foreign exchange bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of borrowing from the victim.
2. On November 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the instant company around November 12, 2012, the victim H through the team leader G to the effect that “if any money to be used for business purposes is necessary, he/she will be repaid after one week if he/she lends it to the victim H.”
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he was thought to use it for his personal purpose, and there was no intention or ability to pay it.
Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the victim and was transferred 30 million won to the foreign exchange bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of borrowing from the victim.
3. On November 23, 2012 and November 26, 2012, the defrauded: (a) around November 23, 2012, the Defendant: (b) lent the victim I the money to be used for the business of the company to the victim for the purpose of the business of the company to the extent of five (5) days if the victim I lent the money to the victim I for seven million won; and (c) around November 26, 2012, the Defendant was aware that the amount would be “the victim” from the above company to the victim; and (d) the Defendant said that the amount would be paid to the victim if it is necessary to do so.
However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he was thought to use it for his personal purpose, and there was no intention or ability to pay it.
Accordingly, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby, was the Defendant on November 23, 2012 from the victim.