The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

, however, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, along with B and C, conspired with B to purchase a mobile phone in the name of D using the above resident registration certificate and sell the mobile phone and divide the profits therefrom.

A. At around 19:20 on February 1, 2016, the Defendant, along with B and C, entered “D” in the bank name for payment of charges, and entered “D”, “D” in the name column of customer information column, “D”, “D Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Haon Ham Ham Ham Hamn,” “I” in the bank name column for payment of charges, “D” in the bank name, “D” in the bank column for payment of charges, “D” in the name following the bank name, “D”, “I” in the bank column for payment of charges,” and “D” in the continuous written contract for sale of the horse and installment contract, and “D” in the name, “D” and “Imnm Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ham Ha,” written.

As a result, the defendant, B, and C have forged a new contract for mobile phone service in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations, a short-term transaction contract, and a installment payment contract, and exercised it for the purpose of exercising them in collusion.

B. Although the title of the facts charged in this part of the indictment on fraud and unlawful uttering of official document does not stipulate “the unlawful uttering of official document”, it is evident that the charge of unlawful uttering of official document was indicted on this part under the main text of the facts charged and the provisions of the applicable law.

The defendant, together with B and C, paragraph 1 above.