The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable considering the following circumstances: (a) the defendant recognized the crime of this case; (b) the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case under favorable circumstances or circumstances; (c) the defendant had been punished several times for fines for the same kind of crime; (d) the defendant has committed some of the crimes (e.g., highest 881; hereinafter referred to as "highest 881"; hereinafter referred to as "highest 9032"; (e) the defendant continued to commit a second crime (the crime; hereinafter referred to as "secondest 881"; hereinafter referred to as "highest 3098"; (d) the defendant did not agree with the victims; (e) there was no change in circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below; (e) the amount of damage amount; (e) the defendant's character and conduct, the motive and means of the crime of this case; and (e) the circumstances in the pleading and the records after the crime of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.