The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (for six months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime; (c) the Defendant had been subject to punishment several times for the same type of crime; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime even during the period of repeated crime; (b) the Defendant did not agree with the victim; (c) there was no change in the circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment; and (d) other circumstances, such as the amount of damage; (d) the Defendant’s character and conduct; (e) the motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.