logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.11 2017노1801
학교보건법위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is against the Defendant’s depth, in the event that the lower court’s sentence becomes final and conclusive, the revocation of the suspended sentence and the result of excessive treatment, and in the case of the 2015 senior 3057 senior 3057 senior 2015 senior 2015 senior 2015 senior 307 senior 3057 senior 2013 senior 206 senior 206 senior 1296 senior 203 senior 2016 senior 203 senior 206 senior 1296 senior 203 senior 203 senior 2013 senior 206 senior 203 senior 303 senior 3057 senior 3057 senior 208)

2. There are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered after the pronouncement of the judgment below.

The act of arranging sexual traffic needs to be punished strictly because of the great social harm and injury such as the commercialization of women's sex and the harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals.

The defendant continued to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic even while he was under investigation and trial after the act of arranging sexual traffic, and has continued to commit the same crime even though he was subject to suspended execution due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging sexual traffic (such as arranging sexual traffic).

The crime of each of the 2017 Highest 1296 cases is a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, which has become final and conclusive in the judgment of the court below, and ex post facto concurrent crimes.

In addition, considering the circumstances surrounding the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal, considering the various circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unlimited and it is not determined that the Defendant exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

The defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3...

arrow