logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.12 2017나80783
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance is examined (no evidence newly submitted to this court), the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance “1984” is deemed as “1989,” and the third part “regular” of the first part is deemed as “mental” and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it is acceptable

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case must be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justified in its conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow