logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.12 2017나79523
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Accordingly, the court's explanation on the instant case is as follows: (a) No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “a couple who has reported a marriage is the legally married couple who has reported a marriage; (b) agreed on January 30, 2018; and (c) No. 2); and (d) No. 11 of the 2nd 11, respectively, read as “a person who has a sexual intercourse several times at the time of expulsion.” (b) added the statement of No. 17 evidence and the testimony of the witness C of the trial of the first instance to “which is the ground for recognition,” and (c) No. 20 to No. 3rd 1 of the 2nd 2nd 12nd 2nd 12nd 2nd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow