1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases of dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, "1,468,630 won" shall be deemed as "1,548,290 won" in the sum of monthly insurance premiums in the fifth and sixth [Attachment 2] of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The 7th part of the first instance judgment "the monthly insurance premium reaches KRW 1,385,950," and "the monthly insurance premium reaches KRW 1,465,610," respectively.

The "total amount of the premiums" of the 8th 16th eth 16th eth eth 132,670 won in the judgment of the first eth eth 136,510 won in the aggregate of the premiums.

The following shall be added in the front of the 9th judgment of the first instance.

An insurance contract of which the Defendant had been in force as the insured at the time of entering into the instant insurance contract, No. 1 to 3,7, and 90 won, and the sum of the monthly insurance premiums was KRW 219,190. As seen earlier, it is acknowledged that the Defendant violated the duty of disclosure by stating that “3 cases, insurance premiums: 150,00 won,” among the “matters to be notified to another insurance company” under the subscription form of the instant insurance contract, is “as seen earlier,” and stating that “the matters to be notified to another insurance company,” “the insurance company,” is “one hundred and fifty thousand won: 150,00 won.”

However, it is difficult to say that the insurance contract in this case was null and void because it constitutes an act of anti-social order, aside from whether such a cause constitutes a ground for cancellation or termination of the insurance contract.

A person shall be appointed.

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.