1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases of dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

"D" of the fifth, fourth, fourth, and 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be respectively dismissed as "I".

"257,636,500 won" in the fifth sentence of the first instance judgment is "257,636,560 won (=37,59,780 won) 74,618,240 won 68,09,540 won, 77,319,00 won)."

Part 5 of the first instance judgment "102 Dong 710, Dong 710" shall be deemed "102 Dong 701."

The following is added in front of the 6th judgment of the first instance.

An insurance contract which the Defendant had been in force at the time of entering into the instant insurance contract was 6 cases, and four of them were covered by the daily days of hospitalization. However, among the “liability to notify prior to the instant insurance contract” under the instant insurance contract, the Defendant answer to question “no,” stating “one total of two cases, the name of the company: the name of the company, and the name of the company” as “no,” and the fact of violating the duty of disclosure is acknowledged. However, it is difficult to deem the instant insurance contract to be null and void as it constitutes an act of anti-social order, regardless of whether such a cause constitutes the grounds for cancellation of the insurance contract.”

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.