1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition of some contents as follows. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Each of the 3th, 9, 4th, 6th, 5th, 10th, 6th, 32, and 7th, "Seoul Metropolitan City Mayor" of the first instance court shall be deemed to be "the defendant".

Part 14 of the decision of the first instance court states "the inspection method coordinate" as "the inspection method and the inspection method and the 17th "inspection method and guidance guidance" as "inspection plan".

After the fourth decision of the first instance court, "the operation of driving equipment and the status of emergency measures: the lack of capacity" shall be added.

The 30th of the 6th judgment of the first instance court is the "man of fire-fighting equipment" of the 30th judgment of the first instance as the "operator of fire-fighting equipment".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.