logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고단1940
부동산실권리자명의등기에관한법률위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 19, 2013, Defendant A’s joint crime committed with Defendant E: (a) was anticipated that the seizure of the E’s property would be conducted from the tax official book because the Defendant’s mother traded real estate in the Republic of Korea, F, and nine parcels of land owned by Defendant E, and did not pay KRW 303,91,550, income tax related to the said sale and purchase; (b) the Defendant conspired to conceal the real estate located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant real estate”), along with E, in the form of sale to B, the Defendant’s will be trusted.

According to the above public offering on November 19, 2013, the defendant agreed to entrust the above real estate B and this case to the above B for the purpose of evading or evading the disposition on default at a certified judicial scrivener office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-gu, Seoul, with the intention of evading or evading the disposition on default. As if the above real estate was sold to the above B, the defendant prepared a false real estate sale contract with the person on October 4, 2013, and completed the registration on the transfer of B’s ownership under the name of the trustee, the trustee, on October 4, 2013, on the ground of the sale as of November 22, 2013.

In collusion with E, the Defendant filed a registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the person entrusted with the ownership of the instant real estate under the name of the trust agreement, and concealed the property subject to disposition on default in order to evade or evade the disposition on default.

2. On November 2013, Defendant B prepared a false transaction agreement with Defendant according to the name trust agreement upon the request of the above A at the above certified judicial scrivener office, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant according to the nominal trust agreement.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A suspect interrogation protocol for Defendant A (Provided, That this case is recognized on the 7th page of the evidence record on the 203th page).

“......”

arrow