Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 168,095,306 to Plaintiff A, KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 2,50,000 to Plaintiff C and D, respectively.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The parties to the case are corporations operating the Han River University Sejong Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and the Plaintiff A received from the Defendant Hospital treatment, such as brain ties, etc., while the Plaintiff’s wife, Plaintiff C, and D are children of Plaintiff A.
B. (1) On September 2014, Plaintiff A’s symptoms, such as cryp, etc., was found to have cerebral crymosis in the front line transport connection, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on March 24, 2015 for additional tests and treatment after undergoing outpatients treatment at the Defendant Hospital’s hospital.
(2) As a result of the blood crypology test and the brain computer stratograph (CT) test conducted on March 29, 2015 at the Defendant Hospital, it was confirmed that Plaintiff A’s electric bryphosomes with a size of about 4 meters in size in the electric brypulatory transport route.
At the time of hospitalization, the consciousness of the plaintiff A was clear, and there was no other abnormal signs than brain ties.
C. On April 11, 2015, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the instant surgery from around 11:00 to around 15:30 of the same day with respect to the Plaintiff A, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the instant surgery and the instant surgery with respect to the Plaintiff A (hereinafter “instant surgery”).
The operation of this case conducted with the Plaintiff A, after a general anesthesia into the Republic of Korea, after cutting the two sides of the upper left side, cutting the two sides of the upper left side, cutting the light, towing the sphere by towing the sphere and towing the sphere by towing the sphere, and then conducting the cerebral connection sphere and checking the flow of the sphere, and then combining the operation.
On the same day immediately after the instant surgery, there was no special opinion on blood transfusion as a result of brain CT testing conducted with the Plaintiff at around 17:2. D.
After the instant surgery (1) Plaintiff A continued to be in an unrepared state immediately after the instant surgery, and his blood pressure was lowered.
(2) The medical staff of the Defendant Hospital are Plaintiff.