beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On May 20, 2017, at around 13:20, the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts) is that the fire on the second floor E (hereinafter “the instant fire”) in Chungcheong-si, Chungcheongnam-si, the relationship between the Defendant’s negligence and the Defendant’s negligence and the occurrence of the instant fire should be recognized. However, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal
A. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that Defendant C is a gas supplier who supplied LP gas prior to the conversion of urban gas into the second floor of the instant building.
LP gas supplier has a duty of care to supply gas after checking whether the length of gas string and the string connecting strings are installed.
Nevertheless, from February 16, 2016, Defendant C continued to supply gas despite being aware of the fact that there is a problem in the safe supply of gas due to the installation of a connecting part of T-type connecting gas among the above construction works. Defendant A (hereinafter “A”) and Co-Defendant B (hereinafter “B”) of the lower court’s joint Defendant A (hereinafter “A”) and Co-Defendant B of the lower judgment (hereinafter “B”) removed the LP gas pipeline license connected to the boiler in the above construction site around October 31, 2016, and did not take measures to prevent the gas pipeline from spreading at the upper part of the LP gas pipeline in the course of installing the gas pipeline.
Defendant
C. On May 20, 2017, around 13:20 on May 20, 2017, the victim F residing in the instant building: (a) turned out whether the victim F, who was living in the instant building, was a gas train; (b) the fire was broken down with the gas leaked from the gas pipe not taking any measures to prevent the occurrence of the fire; and (c) the victim suffered 60% of the salt image due to the foregoing accident.
Defendant
C is jointly with A and B and caused the victim to do so on June 22, 2017, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.