logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.18 2019고단3365
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are public officials of the Dong fee who work together in the Yangcheon-gu Office.

1. Defendant A

A. On April 4, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30, the bus stops located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, 194; (b) who was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol, and was asked the victim, who was under the jurisdiction of the police officer of the Seoul Hypo Police Station C (28 years old), of the victim D(28 years old), who was the police officer of the Seoul Hypo Police Station, called “I would have been dispatched after receiving the report, and I would have to be able to assist the police; (c) “I would have been able to get the victim’s body, as his hand, tightd with the victim’s body; (d) if I would have been boomed with the left part, she would have been boomed, and she would have been bread with the neck.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of the victim.

B. The Defendant assaulted the victim by taking three times the steps of the victim E (the age of 34) who was waiting for the bus at the above time and place.

2. Defendant B’s insult, at the same time and place as above, and the police officers dispatched to the scene, such as the Victim F (the age of 51) who was a police officer affiliated with the above police box, arrested the above A in flagrant offender, and when citizens such as the above E and D were reported, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by taking the victim’s speech with the large sound called “Yama, Neaea bom bom bom bom bom bom boms, and bom boms.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of suspect examination by the police against the Defendants

1. Application of each statute to police statements made to D, F, and E;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Articles 136(1) and 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties), and the choice of each fine

B. Defendant B: Article 311 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine)

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes (Defendant A);

1. Detention at a workhouse;

arrow