logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.06 2014고단6455
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 20 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

▣ 범죄전력 피고인은 2014. 5. 21. 수원지방법원에서 사기죄로 징역 4월에 집행유예 1년을 선고받고 2015. 1. 30. 그 판결이 확정되었다.

▣ 범죄사실

1. Around November 10, 2013, the Defendant committed a crime against Victim C, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “E” in the office of “E” located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD Building 1025, stating that “The victim will return the money if the Defendant would be awarded a successful bid for a childcare center at the e-mail e-mail apartment management e-mail-dong, a 30 million won in the name of the bid cost and deposit.”

However, even if the money has been received from the victim, it was thought that it will be used as office operating expenses and living expenses, and the victim did not have the ability to operate the childcare center through the award of the above apartment childcare center, and there was no intention or ability to pay even if it did not have any property or ability to pay the money from the victim.

After all, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained 30 million won as the starting money and deposit money for bidding from the victim on November 20 of the same year.

2. On August 27, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim of the law firm office located in the Busan High-dong, Busan High-dong, Busan High-gu, that “E representative will offer a public bid for the child care center operator at the apartment representative meeting, but the person located in the Busan High-dong, Busan High-dong, would offer a public bid for the child care center operator at the apartment representative meeting, and would return the money if the contract is not awarded.”

However, even if the money was received from the victim, it was thought that it was used as office operating expenses and living expenses, and the victim did not have the ability to operate the childcare center through the award of the above apartment childcare center.

arrow